
This has caused an uproar and it seems as if mothers are bearing arms and teeth in response to the change. Even though the company said that they were doing this so that as kids get older, they can still follow Dora and not really have to deal with the pre-K concept.

Now, the tween Dora is supposed to be around 9 or 10 and she'll have a new group of friends who will accompany her on her adventures. But now people are saying that why couldn't Dora still look like the little tomboy with the haircut and hiking boots and "talking backpack". Why does she have to have long hair and jewelry? And most people thought she was wearing a short dress instead of a tunic and leggings which is what most normal elementary school girls wear. I mean, if the new character is created for kids from 5-9, then why would Dora need a talking backpack? She has friends to play with now. Why does she need a monkey for a sidekick? She has to go to school now, she doesn't have all day to go wandering outside like she did before.
I'm thinking, why can't she have long hair and explore? Does she really need hiking boots? Maybe she's exploring other things like, the environment, trying to get her community to be more green, or dealing with problems that most kids go through in school? There are ways to be inquisitive still and explore for more information without having to trek outside. They can also go into more details in teaching the kids Spanish as well.
What do you think? Also, anyone else have any so-called controversies that seemed to be blown waaaay out of proportion because people either can't handle things like change.........or they jump to too many conclusions without getting the entire story? You know, things like that.