| Wingates
|
|
Dec 05 2008 05:23 AM
|
 |
only if it was 1 pixel less horizontally
|
| |
 |
| |
| Vulpi
|
|
Dec 05 2008 06:07 AM
|
 |
It's almost as if the little dotted line is pointing directly to it.
|
| |
|
| |
| jinalbert
|
|
Dec 05 2008 06:44 AM
|
 |
You never see them that big in the PV or a video. I wonder if it has been digitally enhanced to make them ... bigger.
|
| |
|
| |
| heachan
|
|
Dec 05 2008 07:56 AM
|
 |
LOL...Do i even need you guys to clear me what you talking abt XD..
seriously no need XD
|
| |
|
| |
| Glasseyelashes
|
|
Dec 05 2008 08:05 AM
|
 |
i'm guessing they're referring to her chestal region. if so, it doesn't look any bigger than any other time. not that i intentionally look or anything >>;;
|
| |
|
| |
| TrueLover
|
|
Dec 05 2008 02:15 PM
|
 |
She Likes NoT WeaR aNy UPper Wear..LOL
|
| |
|
| |
| ayubon
|
|
Dec 05 2008 04:30 PM
|
 |
LOL you guys, wishful thinking... that's just folded fabric.
|
| |
|
| |
| sculpey12
|
|
Dec 05 2008 05:33 PM
|
 |
I think Wingates was referring to the image resolution. One pixel width less would make the picture 1337. Although, knowing that still didn't stop me from looking at her chest :)
|
| |
|
| |
Comments 
