6 replies to this topic

[cdean12343]

Thanks everyone for your kind input. I appreciate your help.

 

This thread may now be closed.

[Lalalaalala]

you should do whatever you personally feel most comfortable with. If you're comfortable with yourself you will automatically become more attractive. 

you do you, bruh.

[cdean12343]

Thanks lala for the reply. I don't mind either way. I'm comfortable if other (girls) are comfortable. I don't want to get it all off and then have girls say I look like a raw chicken. lol

[Lalalaalala]

Alright well, I personally prefer hair in general - it, in my opinion, feels more "grown up" 

I do, however, have a lot of friends who are the opposite of me, and prefer completely cleanshaven. So yeah, you'll find girls in either corner. 

[cdean12343]

Would it stand out in a strange way to you (like the equivalent of a girl having lots of body hair)? Or would you not care, or not notice?

[celestia414]

Fully hairless, including arms and legs, is a bit weird to me. I'd say having no hair or minimal hair on the back/chest area is a plus. I mean, I wouldn't break up with a guy because he had hair there, but I think it's better without. I also dislike facial hair (personal preference obviously). It's scratchy and food can get stuck in it (yuck). Doesn't ask about pubic hair, but I'd say groom it but don't fully remove because the prepubescent look is a little creepy.

 

I'd also keep in mind that hair removal treatment can cause a pimply rash and irritation to the skin at first (I know people who have had it done) so you might not want that over your whole body at once.

[cdean12343]

Thanks everyone for your input and taking my survey. I have decided based on the results and discussion that the best option for me would be to leave the leg/arm hairs intact!

 

If there are lots of girls out there who prefer hairless, I think they should be more vocal about their preference, since there are many guys who'd be happy to remove it.

 

Thanks again!